Burger King vs. Burger King – Trademark Clash: From Pune Victory to Bombay HC Stay

  • Home
  • Case Studies
  • Burger King vs. Burger King – Trademark Clash: From Pune Victory to Bombay HC Stay

A long-running trademark dispute between the U.S. based Burger King Corporation and a local Pune eatery using the same name has escalated from a local court victory for the eatery to a fresh challenge in the Bombay High Court.

  • The case Burger King Corporation vs. Ms. Anahita Irani and another involved a legal dispute between the U.S. based Burger King Corporation and a local restaurant in Pune, India, which had been operating under the same name. This legal battle, which lasted 13 years, centered around trademark rights and the use of the “Burger King” name.

 

  • The conflict began in 2011 when Burger King Corporation filed a lawsuit against Anahita and Shapoor Irani, owners of the Pune-based “Burger King” restaurant. The U.S. corporation sought a permanent injunction to prevent the Irani’s from using the “Burger King” name, claiming it caused brand confusion and infringed upon their trademark rights. Additionally, Burger King Corporation sought INR 20 lakh in damages for the alleged harm to its brand and reputation.

 

  • The Irani family argued that their restaurant had been using the “Burger King” name since 1992, which was well before the U.S. fast-food giant entered the Indian market in 2014. They maintained that their use of the name was legitimate, as they had been continuously operating under the “Burger King” brand in Pune for decades and counterclaimed for damages of INR 20 lakh for the wrong done by Burger King Corporation.

 

  • Burger King Corporation, however, contended that their global brand presence and registered trademarks should grant them exclusive rights to the name in India. They argued that the continued use of the name by the Pune based restaurant would cause irreparable harm to their brand’s reputation and confuse consumers.

 

  • In the judgement, the Pune District Court, under Judge Sunil Vedpathak, ruled in favor of the Irani family. The court found that the Pune restaurant had been an honest and prior user of the “Burger King” name, having established its business long before the U.S. company registered its trademark in India.

 

  • The court emphasized that the U.S. corporation failed to provide sufficient evidence that the Pune restaurant’s use of the “Burger King” name had caused any confusion among customers or harmed the global brand. It also highlighted that Burger King Corporation did not begin operations in India until 2014.

 

  • As a result, the court dismissed the claims of trademark infringement and passing off, denying the U.S. corporation’s request for a permanent injunction. Furthermore, the court rejected the demand for INR 20 lakh in damages of both the Parties stating that there is no evidence on behalf of Burger King Corporation regarding proof of infringement of its trademark and actual damage cause to it and that the Irani family had not provided adequate evidence of financial loss due to the legal proceedings.

 

  • However, Burger King Corporation appealed this decision to the Bombay High Court, seeking to overturn the Pune court’s ruling and obtain an injunction against the Pune restaurant’s use of the “Burger King” name. On August 26, 2024, the High Court issued an interim order restraining the Pune restaurant from using the “Burger King” name until the next hearing, scheduled for September 6, 2024.

 

Burger King Corporation vs. Ms. Anahita Irani and another

Civil Suit No. – 02/2011

Share: